If old posts from KVR and the like are to be believed, the S1000 uses 8-point sinc interpolation, which is far less susceptible to aliasing than the linear interpolation commonly used, since sinc interpolation is inherently band-limited (although not perfectly in this case, due to the relatively low number of taps). Miminashi wrote:One big differentiator between samplers is the interpolation scheme used for transpostion. And thus, listing sit there to never sell, then someone else comes along and thinks the listing is the going rate and lists it for almost the same.Īnd then someone like me comes along, knows people won't pay the reverb going rate because that's not really the going rate for sold ones, and I sell mine, while other sit and wait to hope someone without an internet connection comes along. The problem is everyone thinks their gear is still worth almost the same as they paid. I've also bought some gear that was a new listing and a good price.
I listed my Rev2 on Reverb, put a really nice price on it, gone the same day I listed it, while my listing here and CL (same price) only got two tire kickers. Not true, the sales that are well priced sell within a day.
Fully updated S900s don’t even go for that much and they are much more in demand. No is paying or has paid $900 for a stock s1000 in like 20 years.
Sir Ruff wrote:Reverb is no longer a place to regularly find reasonably priced gear-it’s become a place for price speculation.
0 kommentar(er)
